A. Asohan: So do you want media freedom or not?

It’s all very well to gripe about the lack of a free and fair press. Question is: Have you done anything to deserve one?

THERE’S a piece of wisdom whose truth is so self-evident that it’s been handed down the generations in various forms and via different media.

There are different aspects to this truism, and even Michael Jackson sang something about the man in the mirror.

I understand it thusly: Before you blame others for your woes, take a good look at yourself.

Nowhere was this form of self-denial more evident than in the talk on press freedom by Minister’s in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, organised by the National Press Club, the National Union of Journalists and the Centre for Independent Journalism (www.cijmalaysia.org/) two weeks ago.

The talk was followed by a “walk for press freedom” coordinated by the parties above, as well as the Writer Alliance for Media Independence, Benar for Free and Fair Media and the National Bloggers Alliance.

More than 150 journalists, civil society advocates, non-governmental organisation representatives and interested bloggers had squeezed into the National Press Club for Zaid’s speech.

He started off with a courageous – in my opinion at least – and relevant attack on the disenchanted crowd arrayed before him: Don’t blame the Government for everything. What have you done to push for reforms? How many of you are willing to risk jail or unemployment for your principles?

He soldiered on, despite some boos and catcalls from some journalists and ex-journalists – a tad ironic considering this is a profession whose code of ethics includes giving every opinion, perspective or viewpoint due consideration and the right to be aired.

It’s as if we had all forgotten that much of the malaise facing the media in Malaysia can be laid squarely at our feet.

The minister was right. We’re not a united front. We’re a bunch of professionals who compete against each other, sometimes fractiously. Sure, we may come together for select issues and at certain times, but when we go back to our newsrooms, we’re out to scoop each other.

And we’re a bunch of different individuals too. Some are journalists because it was the only job we could get, others because we wanted to serve society, a few just drifted into it, a small few because we felt the “call”, some because it seemed a good idea at the time, and quite a number saw it as a stepping stone.

We all have different views of our profession, and practise it with varying degrees of adherence to ethics and principles. Don’t let anybody tell you otherwise.

There are, of course, damned good journalists in Malaysia, and they’ll tell you tales of reporters being sidelined because they were considered loose cannons, others being put in “cold storage” to appease corporate and political masters, some being scolded for wasting their time on “dangerous” stories.

We’re blaming the Government for all of this?

Let’s clean up our act first, then we can talk.

But there was a bit of spin-doctoring that Sunday. There are laws in this country that adversely affect the media in this country. Laws that, even if you belief in the need for them, have been inconsistently applied and abused.

They are of course the Printing Presses and Publications Act, the Official Secrets Act, the Internal Security Act, the Sedition Act and these days, the Communications and Multimedia Act.

Zaid said that if these laws were to be reviewed or even repealed, the media better have something in mind to replace them, else there would be anarchy.

I beg to differ. First, Zaid is too intelligent not to know that “anarchy” (from the Greek anarchia or “without a ruler”) in its original meaning doesn’t equate to “disorder”.

Second, the Government shouldn’t get a “get [out] of jail” card here either. These laws have been misused or abused by people in government far too much and for far too long.

Just as much as we journalists should not blame the Government for everything, or look to it to resolve our woes, the Government should not deflect from its own responsibility here either.

As a few participants pointed out at the talk, there have been attempts by the media for reform, but they’ve fallen on deaf ears.

The media, the Government … who else can we point a finger at here?

How about you, the people of Malaysia? There is some truth to the saying that the media acts as a mirror on society, and that it can only reflect the ideals and aspirations of the society it serves.

For 50 years, you folks kept returning to power, and almost always with a two-thirds majority, the parties that have enacted and implemented these laws. By doing so, you gave your tacit approval.

And cynical journalists would be quick to point out that the Malaysian electorate usually starts demanding reforms only in times of great economic turmoil, which seems to come in 10-year cycles. When stomachs start to rumble, as it were.

There are many journalists who wonder if a free and independent media is what the Malaysian public really wants. There are some who have quit the profession because they felt betrayed by the very society they were trying to serve.

Zaid said he was willing to continue engaging the media. The organisers of the June 1 “talk and walk” said they would continue to push for reforms. There is discussion of a parliamentary select committee being formed to look into the issue.

All of us – the press, the powers-that-be and the public – are stakeholders here. But unless we’re willing to look at ourselves and admit to our own culpability first, we won’t be able to change ourselves, let alone transform the media landscape here.

*******

Taken from The StarOnline column, Stray Thoughts by A. Asohan.

This is one of the very very few articles today that actually admit outright that even journalists themselves are not united in what they are championing for. And the BENAR Walk for Media Freedom was definitely proof of this point. The lack of signatories for the Memorandum is another.

I have found A. Asohan’s columns very interesting, probably because he writes with a humourous wit that seems to be lacking in most other columns/articles. But his articles also provide food for thought, because the very points he raises provoke some thinking and self-reflection.

He is right in saying that there are laws and acts in Malaysia that form the shackles of media freedom. In fact, these are the very shackles that we are trying very hard to break. But how many are serious in wanting to break free? How many are willing to strip naked, so to speak, and stand for what they believe is the correct thing to do? How many of us are willing to step out of the shadows that the Internet allows us to hide in?


2 Comments on “A. Asohan: So do you want media freedom or not?”

  1. A. Asohan says:

    Oh god, thank you for this … I’m being roasted over at Malaysia Today by people who are obviously commenting on the column without having read it.
    http://www.malaysia-today.net/2008/content/view/8830/84/

    I was wondering if all my writing skills had deserted me for them to get the completely wrong idea of what I was saying here😉

    You’ve restored my faith in the intelligence of Malaysians — no, you don’t have to agree with me, and feel free to criticise, but have to the intelligence to know what you’re criticising.
    ___________
    Well, there are supporters, and there are blind supporters. I don’t claim to know much, but I don’t jump into bandwagons quite that easily. Your articles have been interesting, some of which I don’t quite agree with, but seem to have feasible points anyhow. I look forward to reading more from you.🙂

  2. veniceshek says:

    A.A.,

    What do you expect from those comments coming out from Malaysia-Today (MT)? Almost all those ‘lepakking’ at MT are anti-establishment and anti-MSM. Most of them do not use much of their brains and are simply criticizing just about anything coming out from the BN government, BN component parties and MSM. Never mind if whatever being heard and reported are lies but more importantly they must be within their sentiment.

    I find this is one of the biggest problems with weblogs. Many of them have become the center for spreading lies and inaccuracies. It is sad that weblogs have been abused in this manner. The irony is that there are so many others who simply believe in what is written in weblogs without considering its factuality. In other words, it is the blind leading the blind. Thirty years from now, I do not think I can ever distinguish information from the truth and the lies. Another sign of the fall in the human race?
    ____________
    Most of us believe what we want to. Like I said, there are supporters, and there are blind supporters. But there are always reasonable people. “The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth” is something we always strive for, but it’s not always there. There will always, in my opinion, be an element of self-perception.

    Have faith in the human race. Have faith in the better minds of Malaysians.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s